From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 6 06:31:33 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA21797 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 06:31:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shell2.la.best.com (shell2.la.best.com [209.24.216.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA21792 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 06:31:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nugundam@shell2.la.best.com) Received: (from nugundam@localhost) by shell2.la.best.com (8.9.1/8.9.0/best.sh) id GAA13341 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 06:30:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19990106063026.A11477@la.best.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 06:30:26 -0800 From: "Joseph T. Lee" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCO Unix vrs. FreeBSD References: <199901041525.JAA24266@mail.netsys.hn> <199901041549.PAA26823@cywub.sitel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199901041549.PAA26823@cywub.sitel.com>; from Jack Winslade on Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 09:49:14AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 09:49:14AM -0600, Jack Winslade wrote: > The later FBSD versions can also run SCO binaries. I know of one case > where an Informix SE license was moved from SCO to FBSD with very little > hassle. They also tell me (the ubiquitous 'they') that Oracle runs fine > under FBSD as well. How about SCO drivers? Seems lots of vendors still surprisingly support SCO, besides mainstay windows, for their products. SCO drivers aren't directly usable by the free OSs, I presume.. Joseph To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message