From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 21 09:40:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3009316A4BF for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hysteria.spc.org (hysteria.spc.org [195.206.69.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E36A643FE0 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bms@hysteria.spc.org) Received: (qmail 5993 invoked by uid 5013); 21 Aug 2003 16:37:49 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:37:49 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: David O'Brien , arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030821163749.GC11682@spc.org> References: <20030821161114.GA7094@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030821161114.GA7094@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: SPC Subject: Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 16:40:50 -0000 On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:11:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > What do people think? Can we loose these type of warnings? I'm not sure > what their need is. The beauty of RCng is that I can say I want Amd (for I agree with you, but perhaps the warnings should be preserved elsewhere? Or toggleable via an rc.conf switch? BMS