From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 6 10:21:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED6D15037; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 10:21:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA01348; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 10:21:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: Steve Ames , committers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Jan 2000 08:59:44 PST." <20000106085944.D1417@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 10:21:40 -0800 Message-ID: <1346.947182900@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > My question is not how much time the developers are being given -- the > *real* question is how much time the developers will give. Thank you for saying this. If developers were constant-output devices, we wouldn't need code freezes to motivate them into moving at all. :-) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message