From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 11 17:02:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA10053 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 17:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from patrick.interlog.com (patrick.interlog.com [206.108.68.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA10043; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 17:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (patrick@localhost) by patrick.interlog.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA00303; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 20:01:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: patrick.interlog.com: patrick owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 20:01:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Patrick McConnell To: Tom Savage cc: Brandon Gillespie , Greg Stringfellow , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BIND Question In-Reply-To: <199709112242.RAA15773@dhc.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I don't know about that - $ host highlandpark.k12.tx.us highlandpark.k12.tx.us mail is handled (pri=0) by HPISD_ADMIN.HIGHLANDPARK.K12.TX.US and reverse lookups on this host (HPISD_ADMIN) seem to fail. On Thu, 11 Sep 1997, Tom Savage wrote: > Brandon, Greg: > Your customer is probably trying to send a message to > (hpisd_admin@highlandpark.k12.tx.us) Highland Park ISD's url is > www.highlandpark.k12.tx.us > Tom > > ---------- > > From: Brandon Gillespie > > To: Greg Stringfellow > > Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: Re: BIND Question > > Date: Thursday, September 11, 1997 3:56 PM > > > > On Thu, 11 Sep 1997, Greg Stringfellow wrote: > > > > > Here is an interesting question, or at least to me right now. > > > > > > I've got a customer who is trying to send mail to a particular > location. The > > > hostname is "HPISD_ADMIN.HIGHLANDPARK.K12.TX.US". I remember reading > > > somewhere about the underscores in a hostname not being valid. But I > just > > > can't seem to track it down. > > > > You are right, underscores are not a valid part of a domain name, even > > though old DNS servers would allow them (all that is valid is a-z0-9 and > a > > dash, I believe). > > > > > Any ideas? Am I going crazy? Have I not read something that I should > have > > > from being too busy? All of the above? > > > > I dont know why it is behaving as it does--I would suspect the reason its > > NOT working is because of the underscore, and 'nslookup' isn't being as > > pedantic about it as it should be. Two suggestions: > > > > 1) get them to fix their domain name > > 2) use the raw ip addr, as given by nslookup > > > > -Brandon Gillespie > > > -- Patrick McConnell (patrick@interlog.com) "640k ought to be enough for anybody." -Bill Gates, 1981