From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jun 1 15:31:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from epsilon.lucida.qc.ca (epsilon.lucida.qc.ca [216.95.146.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BACB37B7DE for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 15:31:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET) Received: (qmail 5711 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Jun 2000 22:31:06 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Jun 2000 22:31:06 -0000 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 18:31:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Heckaman X-Sender: matt@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca To: Jan Knepper Cc: FreeBSD-ISP@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Burstable T1 In-Reply-To: <3936DCD4.C8C68F4B@smartsoft.cc> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Jan Knepper wrote: [...] : What I actually meant to ask is does any one of you have experience : with Burstable T1 and how it turns out. Did you stay in the scale : assigned or turned it out to be uncontrolable? I'm on a burstable T1 from UUnet here. They bill on 95th percentile as usual, however you have to be over your billing teir for two months in a row before you are billed at the higher teir. This provides some safety in that there's never a surprise about a billing increase. However, if you are not careful you will end up paying them far more than they should get. Once you get over the 384Kbit teir, it costs you more than a flat rate T1. : Don't worry, be Kneppie! : Jan Matt Heckaman matt@arpa.mail.net http://www.lucida.qc.ca -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp iD8DBQE5NuQpdMMtMcA1U5ARAsJ5AKCR2CW6DE52q+73tu1FNZmJOJffAACgsE/C fDGaUT3hYfoXIItMzd8x+8I= =+NHu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message