From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 19:42:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E8216A41F for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:42:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from huyxvu@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCA843D49 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:42:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from huyxvu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so211051wra for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:42:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=UUfaYLxufksdpp/XPkkIQmQlWGrlRNW40MFpVert9p1R1ENBxywZgPh2OJd9JcTch+wZz7LzRaDZ11PplUljAXH3wZlUjZxE2ckCTd2idfKDnQdUw/8EkpZttj5T/nYptmySJ9BkYbLFlbS/4Gzrzl06gSc/gIurjbalivUi9EY= Received: by 10.54.40.20 with SMTP id n20mr671003wrn; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.101.4 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9567a4dc0508171242378fb2cd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:42:08 -0400 From: Huy Vu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Bridging of virtual interface and sis0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:42:13 -0000 Hi, This what I would like to do ... Switch <->[sis0 bridge ngeth0.(mesh protocol).ath0] <-wireless-> [ath0.(mesh proto).ngeth0 bridge sis0] <-> switch= =20 The above configuration should allow me to have layer 2 access from the switch to switch. It's either I'm doing something wrong or it is not possible... If I replace the bridge functionality in each of the box with routing then it works. But this means that I have to configure each of the virtual interfaces and sis0 interfaces for each of the box and run routed (i.e. operating at layer 3 instead of layer 2). I use the standard ng_bridge example to bridge BRIDGE_IFACES=3D"ngeth0 sis0" LOCAL_IFACE=3D"sis0" ... So the question I have is will ng_bridge code work accross virtual ethernet interface. Thanks, Huy