From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 13 14:39:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A4316A4CE for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:39:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A24E43D54 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:39:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from unix4all@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so142860wri for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:39:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T6eg+Q/boebgEaBsp1Z48EmCl/XiYuVtbNqT9+82hwRpJ+tp3JxRWz6HcUuZHkIRvPRsUrfras7wATzv72YRMNM+xfQ/pZ1UrEU2CUPSM9L2RG9hzoAtT6cE95IArzk/wXqbobhrBaZ4Lb8JPsFfndt0OlZCUXtOBwcmZZN3wrY= Received: by 10.54.49.5 with SMTP id w5mr625676wrw; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.104.3 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2cadd22605041307394d17948d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:39:39 +0200 From: "Jacobo Arvelo \"UNIX4ALL\"" To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050413143126.7e0jufn80c0cwow4@netchild.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <425C18A2.8010807@elischer.org> <20050413143126.7e0jufn80c0cwow4@netchild.homeip.net> Subject: Re: Anyone working on V4L2 for BSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Jacobo Arvelo \"UNIX4ALL\"" List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:39:43 -0000 On 4/13/05, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: >=20 > > > > I'm considerring it.. It looks quite doable. (assuming we can get > > compatible include files > > without copyright problems.) > > > > For compatibility we'd probably want to keep all the V4L prefixes etc. > > > > Is anyone else playing with this? >=20 > There was a discussion about something like this a while ago... a, I see = you > participated in it too: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2003-July/000328.ht= ml > http://people.freebsd.org/~jmg/videobsd.html >=20 > Bye, > Alexander. >=20 > -- > http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 > http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137 > BOFH excuse #316: >=20 > Elves on strike (Why do they call EMAG Elf Magic?) >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-multimedia > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-multimedia-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" >=20 Hi all: I think that a framework to video devices such as V4L but for FreeBSD is a must to have feature to the spreading of FreeBSD in the Desktop market, the only thing on my computer that I can=B4t managed to work in FreeBSD is my webcam :(. Sorry for my bad english. greetings, --=20 Jacobo Arvelo "UNIX4ALL" Free/Open/Net/DragonFly BSD Powered User http://www.corralito.org