From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 21:25:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FF616A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:25:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C9043D31 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:25:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065BCF1ABE; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01836-03; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:25:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.199.45.54] (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C60F19BC; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:25:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean McNeil To: Schnoopay In-Reply-To: <4159BFE3.5030009@mackanics.net> References: <4159BFE3.5030009@mackanics.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-H4L4Ine79SXGiM/3Nb4V" Message-Id: <1096406731.1852.5.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:25:32 -0700 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mcneil.com cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 or AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:25:35 -0000 --=-H4L4Ine79SXGiM/3Nb4V Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 12:47, Schnoopay wrote: > I'm soon to be getting an Athlon64 and am debating whether to use the=20 > i386 or AMD64 versions of FreeBSD. I've been running -CURRENT (well, now=20 > RELENF_5) since 5.0 DP1 on my current system and don't mind the=20 > occasional issues that come with doing so. I am curious however what=20 > will and will not work in the AMD64 port. My main concerns are KDE,=20 > Mozilla, oggenc and similar desktop apps. I know most ports I use are=20 > known to be working, and I believe that Linux32 compatability is in a=20 > testing phase currently, anything else I should know before making the=20 > move? Is there a web page somewhere that lists what ports are known=20 > working/not working on AMD64? My main system is an amd64 running -current. Everything works great: gnome, kde, ogg encode/decode, etc. Linux32 compatibility is working as well. I can even run java apps with Linux32. The only thing lacking for me is native java so I can have java support in the browser and get eclipse going. I've been playing with gcc/gcj attempting to get that going, but so far no joy. There might be a few additional ports that will not work under amd64, but I personally use everything native amd64 (except java). Cheers, Sean --=-H4L4Ine79SXGiM/3Nb4V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBWdbLyQsGN30uGE4RArrXAKDocKCfLqPb6+q70yMHOu6MQz/kWgCg4fcn kPwaane5pSXfDwDqP8bHV6k= =faxd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-H4L4Ine79SXGiM/3Nb4V--