From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 25 18:57:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA28715 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 18:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfd1.oit.umass.edu (mailhub.oit.umass.edu [128.119.175.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA28704 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 18:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wilde.oit.umass.edu by rfd1.oit.umass.edu (PMDF V5.1-10 #20973) with ESMTP id <0EH300FM1EQ9SQ@rfd1.oit.umass.edu> for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 21:56:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (gp@localhost) by wilde.oit.umass.edu (8.8.3/8.8.6) with SMTP id VAA28542 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 21:56:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 21:56:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Greg Pavelcak Subject: Optimizing Compile of Ports To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've been installing ports lately instead of packages just for the heck of it. Compile optimizations seem to be out of my control with ports. Ilooked in /etc/make.conf /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk and the individual make files associated with ports and I don't see anything about compile options. Am I missing something, or is this just the way it is? (It's probably a good idea to keep me from messing with this stuff anyway.) Greg