From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 23 08:41:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEF9106566C for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es) Received: from proxypop2.sarenet.es (proxypop2.sarenet.es [194.30.0.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065D78FC15 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.1.204] (izaro.sarenet.es [192.148.167.11]) by proxypop2.sarenet.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A45173946; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:41:43 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Borja Marcos In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:41:43 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <75706651-E9D4-4C40-B39C-6B8B0023DFF7@sarenet.es> References: <4B066B13.1070006@freebsd.org> <4b07ac59.A2Afaf4X0IZlrgGU%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCBA5722E@w2003s01.double-l.local> To: Randy Bush X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: Johan Hendriks , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.2 dies in zfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:41:46 -0000 On Nov 22, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >=20 >> Try running FreeBSD 7-Stable to get the latest ZFS version which on >> FreeBSD is 13 >=20 > that is what i am running. RELENG_7 I've been following ZFS on FreeBSD long ago, and it really seems to be = stable on 8.0/amd64. Even Sun Microsystems say that ZFS is better used on a 64 bit system, = they don't recommend it on the 32 bit version of Solaris. That said, there's still an outstanding bug, I managed to deadlock it = but the condition is easy to avoid. Borja.