From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 23 13:25:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A40B1065670 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2E78FC13 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-127-199.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.127.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E49D2EBC3B; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:25:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:25:54 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080323092554.467fb823.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080322112356.2de9abf0@scorpio> References: <1206160415.6973.44.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20080322083028.777a84a8.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080322112356.2de9abf0@scorpio> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: List replies] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:25:56 -0000 Gerard wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:30:28 -0400 > Bill Moran wrote: > > > Da Rock wrote: > > > > > > Fair enough, but is it necessary on all the lists for freebsd? > > > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > That is one man's point of view. There are several others though. a) What was your point in saying that? b) Not really. It's a list of reasons and the reasons are factual, not opinion. While the overall conclusion is opinion, the article is factual and informative in nature. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com