From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sun Jul 22 08:28:44 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1A51044425 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 08:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889BA8CC7A for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 08:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4C5921044422; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 08:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD8C1044421 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 08:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D006F8CC78 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 08:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 320D41B37C for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 08:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w6M8SgW8072430 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 08:28:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w6M8SgHV072427 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 08:28:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229773] sysutils/dupd: update to version 1.7 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 08:28:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jyri@virkki.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 08:28:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229773 --- Comment #7 from jyri@virkki.com --- Will the port build pass in any prefix other than /usr/local in practice? I can make it take a var (e.g. LIB_PREFIX) and if it set use it as-is, or if not set, default it to /usr/local OTOH, while I'm all for making it flexible I also don't want to add clutter that nobody will use. So if the port build system will ultimately just alwa= ys pass in /usr/local as the prefix, might as well leave it as is. But if this= can vary in FreeBSD installations, then it's worth making it configurable. I haven't done any meaningful testing between -O2 vs. -O3 so can't really s= ay. Perhaps -O2 is fine. I also have not done any performance testing on FreeBS= D. But if you run into any performance weirdness on FreeBSD please file a bug, I'll check it out. I primarily test on Linux (w/gcc) and secondarily on Sol= aris (w/Sun cc). dupd attitude is that RAM is there to be used, so it doesn't limit memory u= sage unless you ask (--buflimit). If you want, send me output of 'dupd scan -v' = and I'll play around with a similar file set in case there is any unwarranted inefficiency there. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=