Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:33:25 +0100
From:      des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        kientzle@acm.org
Subject:   Re: Environment Poisoning and login -p
Message-ID:  <xzp65dsem7e.fsf@dwp.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <20040227122718.GA46119@madman.celabo.org> (Jacques A. Vidrine's message of "Fri, 27 Feb 2004 06:27:19 -0600")
References:  <403CEF67.5040004@kientzle.com> <20040226225149.GB73252@nagual.pp.ru> <403E7B4D.8030803@kientzle.com> <20040227111353.GA14777@sheol.localdomain> <20040227112658.GA36271@nagual.pp.ru> <20040227122718.GA46119@madman.celabo.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 02:27:00PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 05:13:53AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > > > Instead, I've decided to follow Jacques Vidrine's
> > > > suggestion of using a whitelist of environment variables
> > > > that are "known-safe."
> > > Coming in from left field... Will there be some sort of mechanism for
> > > an admin to set/modify this list?
> > I agree we'll need it (because of different assumptions). Something like
> > /etc/safe_environment file.
> Whoa, Let's not complicate things unnecessarily.

Agreed, let's let this discussion die instead.  login(1) is no longer
setuid root, so the whole thing is a non-issue.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp65dsem7e.fsf>