Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:35:22 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doceng@FreeBSD.org, mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, david@catwhisker.org Subject: Re: Attempted upgrade of ghostscript8-8.64_7 -> ghostscript-8.70 failed Message-ID: <20091220203522.GA10931@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20091221.020639.114287386.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <20091220131840.GQ470@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20091220132731.GA94787@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091220133238.GR470@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20091221.020639.114287386.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:06:39AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> wrote > in <20091220133238.GR470@bunrab.catwhisker.org>: > > da> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:27:31PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > da> > ... > da> > > (Though I note that /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/ > da> > > does seem to be populated with several other files.) > da> > > da> > is this i386? > da> > da> Aye.... > da> > da> > I reported this already for sparc and ia64: > da> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-December/058432.html > da> > da> Ah, yes -- I reall you did... (sorry; I glanced at the note for ia64 > da> and made a silly assumption -- and I know what *that* means). > > Fixed just now. This build error occurred only when WITH_FT_BRIDGE > was enabled regardless of the platform. many thanks! -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091220203522.GA10931>