From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 23 15:25:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 55A89106566C; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164BC106564A for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trasz@freebsd.org) Received: from skunkworks.freebsd.org (skunkworks.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035BF8FC13 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from skunkworks.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by skunkworks.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0NFPCkI094507 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:25:12 GMT (envelope-from trasz@freebsd.org) Received: (from perforce@localhost) by skunkworks.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p0NFPC3C094504 for perforce@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:25:12 GMT (envelope-from trasz@freebsd.org) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:25:12 GMT Message-Id: <201101231525.p0NFPC3C094504@skunkworks.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: skunkworks.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to trasz@freebsd.org using -f From: Edward Tomasz Napierala To: Perforce Change Reviews Precedence: bulk Cc: Subject: PERFORCE change 188100 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:25:13 -0000 http://p4web.freebsd.org/@@188100?ac=10 Change 188100 by trasz@trasz_victim on 2011/01/23 15:24:14 Two "deny" rules that differ only by their "amount" value don't make sense. Prevent it. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/soc2009/trasz_limits/sys/kern/kern_rctl.c#15 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/soc2009/trasz_limits/sys/kern/kern_rctl.c#15 (text+ko) ==== @@ -897,6 +897,7 @@ struct uidinfo *uip; struct prison *pr; struct loginclass *lc; + struct rctl_rule *rule2; int match; KASSERT(rctl_rule_fully_specified(rule), ("rule not fully specified")); @@ -905,9 +906,16 @@ return (EOPNOTSUPP); /* - * Make sure there are no duplicated rules. + * Make sure there are no duplicated rules. Also, for the "deny" + * rules, remove ones differing only by "amount". */ - rctl_rule_remove(rule); + if (rule->rr_action == RCTL_ACTION_DENY) { + rule2 = rctl_rule_duplicate(rule, M_WAITOK); + rule2->rr_amount = RCTL_AMOUNT_UNDEFINED; + rctl_rule_remove(rule2); + rctl_rule_release(rule2); + } else + rctl_rule_remove(rule); switch (rule->rr_subject_type) { case RCTL_SUBJECT_TYPE_PROCESS: @@ -916,9 +924,7 @@ rctl_container_add_rule(&p->p_container, rule); /* * In case of per-process rule, we don't have anything more - * to do. Also, there is no point in increasing reference - * count, as the per-process containers never have - * any subcontainers. + * to do. */ return (0);