From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 14 22:14:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 9DA9516A4E1; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:14:03 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20060814221403.GA20498@FreeBSD.org> References: <20060814034705.GC1158@dagan.sigpipe.cz> <20060814021900.GA4617@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060814021900.GA4617@soaustin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: neuhauser@sigpipe.cz, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: maintainer timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:14:03 -0000 On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 09:19:00PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > All I see is the following update with the text "update to version 9.3.7, > approved by: maintainer timeout" by danfe (there were no PRs with libticables > in the Synopsis): > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/comms/libticables/Makefile?rev=1.16&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup > > danfe, any more details here? We've had a follow-up discussion with maintainer shoftly after commit'd been made. It's been a private ping, right now maintainer has no problems with this commit AFAIK. ./danfe