From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 17:00:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB051065670 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:00:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B45F8FC08 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q2AGVUGk022554; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:31:33 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: Alejandro Imass Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:31:33 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201203101436.29082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203102331.33701.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: Joshua Isom , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:00:06 -0000 Hi, On Saturday 10 March 2012 22:08:37 Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Erich Dollansky > wrote: > > > > On Saturday 10 March 2012 14:28:05 Joshua Isom wrote: > > [...] it seems that you delete the 'masterpiece'. > > > > > wine was able to fix the problem. Do not forget that most of the problems Windows has are not linked to design. > > I am guessing this is a sarcastic comment!! > > ALL of Windows' problems are precisely based on poor design... just to > name a few: > > - no clean separation of system and apps it is very clearly separated. > - apps re-write system libs at will Isn't this another masterpiece FreeBSD is far off achieving? > - no lib versioning I think that you are wrong here. It a long time ago but I think I remember they put a version number into the library name. > - there is not out of the box user / admin separation Another point where FreeBSD is far behind. It is not possible to give every user on FreeBSD its own account and full administration rights. > - no filesystem-based security FAT rules! > - default network protocols are insecure Windows has meanwhile default network protocols? I think, I have to do some catching up. > > ...and this is only scratching the surface > > Windows is a well-marketed (gangster-style) piece of crap. Same with > SAP, Oracle and many other widely-used "enterprise grade" IT. These > folks are marketing machines, not technology companies: Cash rules! Erich