From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 30 17:51:34 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBE5106566B
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:51:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from axel@ucs.com)
Received: from exchange.ranch.com (ranch.com [184.183.2.50])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8DC8FC13
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:51:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (70.176.122.205) by exchange.ranch.com (10.1.1.64)
	with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.436.0; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:51:33 -0700
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:52:08 -0700
From: Colin Barnabas <axel@ucs.com>
To: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20110930175208.GB13794@hs1.VERBENA>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Subject: NASM in FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:51:34 -0000

Is there a particular reason that nasm comes standard with
FreeBSD and not fasm?