From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Apr 9 17:53:56 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA22613 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 9 Apr 1995 17:53:56 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id RAA22606 ; Sun, 9 Apr 1995 17:53:54 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: should su retain ${DISPLAY} In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 09 Apr 95 18:52:42 +0200." <199504091652.SAA07493@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Sun, 09 Apr 1995 17:53:54 -0700 Message-ID: <22604.797475234@freefall.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > As Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > > > Your right, it should completely reset the environment as if it was a fre sh > > > login. Speaking of su, why the hell doesnt FreeBSD's su support -c cmd l ike > > > every other su on the planet? > > > > Hmmmm. Therein lies a mystery! > > > > I believe we lost this in the 1.x transition! :-( > > We've never had it. The word `every' in the above sentence must be > `every second'. Actually, yes, we have had it.. :-) Barry Morris (bsm@freebsd.org) did indeed hack it into su back in the 1.x days.. Jordan