Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 08:30:42 -0500 From: "Eric L. Hernes" <erich@lodgenet.com> To: Jim Durham <durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us> Cc: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: socks5 Message-ID: <199510161330.IAA07826@jake.lodgenet.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 15 Oct 1995 20:54:29 EDT." <Pine.BSF.3.91.951015204433.14810A-100000@w2xo.pgh.pa.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 1995, Michael Smith wrote: > > Jim Durham stands accused of saying: > > > > > > I have a successful port of the socks5 proxy server running. I didn't > > > see this in the port collection. > > > I've got a port of socks-4.2.2, that I haven't bothered to commit. Its got all the clients and server and lib (not shared though). If you've got a newer/better version of socks running, I'll just forget the whole thing (socks 4 that is). I've compiled socks versions of telnet, ftp, ncftp1, popclient, sup, and perl4.036 (possible others, but I use these frequently). What does socks5 add? > > > > I'd prefer to see the server and libs built by themselves, and the FreeBSD > > clients (at least telnet and ftp) built using the socks library, rather than > > using the older sources used in the socks clients. That'd be a pretty clean way, if we could come up with a -DSOCKS option for the rest of the system. I even at one time thought about a socksified libc.so so that all clients ``just worked'', but never had time to play with it. > > I haven't submitted anything before, so I'm a newbie at the procedure. > No problem, there always seems to be a couple people willing to help add functionality to the system. > > -Jim Durham > eric. -- erich@lodgenet.com erich@rrnet.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510161330.IAA07826>