From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 29 20:46:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from detlev.UUCP (57-sweet.camalott.com [208.239.153.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F0A14DB7 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 20:46:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joelh@gnu.org) Received: (from joelh@localhost) by detlev.UUCP (8.9.3/8.9.1) id WAA00584; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 22:45:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from joelh) To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP!! NOAOUT `make world' knob changed References: <19990329030228.A1290@dragon.nuxi.com> From: Joel Ray Holveck Date: 29 Mar 1999 22:45:27 -0600 In-Reply-To: "David O'Brien"'s message of "Mon, 29 Mar 1999 03:02:28 -0800" Message-ID: <86pv5regbc.fsf@detlev.UUCP> Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I have just changed made a change concerning the building of legacy a.out > bits during `make world'. > Previous to my change, one would define "NOAOUT" to keep from building > the legacy a.out bits. Now one would define "WANT_AOUT" to build them. > The default of building a.out bits gets in the way of some other changes > I will make to the `build world' process soon. Will WANT_AOUT be considered a supported option? That is, if I choose to build a.out libraries, will I be giving up the right to gripe when `make world' breaks, and be resigned to the ranks of the NOCLEAN masses? Cheers, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message