From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 10 12:34:31 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id MAA03614 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 10 Jan 1995 12:34:31 -0800 Received: from uclink3.berkeley.edu (uclink3.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.136.74]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA03608 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 1995 12:34:31 -0800 Received: from uclink.berkeley.edu by uclink3.berkeley.edu (8.6.8/1.33(web)-OV2) id MAA25175; Tue, 10 Jan 1995 12:34:29 -0800 Received: by uclink.berkeley.edu (8.6.9/1.33(web)-OV4) id MAA28907; Tue, 10 Jan 1995 12:33:02 -0800 From: gibbs@uclink.berkeley.edu (Justin Theodore Gibbs) Message-Id: <199501102033.MAA28907@uclink.berkeley.edu> Subject: Re: Adaptec 2940 support To: rod@eclink.ch Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 12:33:00 -0800 (PST) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <2f0446f1.bigears@bigears.UUCP> from "Rod Johnson" at Dec 30, 94 06:44:15 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 988 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I have just received the FreeBSD 2.0 CDROM from Walnut Creek. I would > like to run it on a TMC PCI54PV combination BCI/VLBus motherboard (yes, > I know, but it seemed like a good idea at the time :-( ) with a P90 > processor and Adaptec SCSI 2490 controller. > > Do you know if FreeBSD 2.0 should run on this setup out of the box, as > it were? If not, is an add-on driver available that I can easily access. > > Many thanks in advance, and congratulations on your achievement in getting > bsd at last to the masses. > > Rod Johnson > -- > Rod Johnson > Fax: +41 91 733561 (8:00 - 20:00 GMT) > rod@eclink.ch or johnson@dial.eunet.ch > Compuserve: 100073,440 If you are still interested in FreeBSD and have ftp access to the net, I would appreciate it if you could test my new experimental support for the 294x series adaptors. freefall.cdrom.com:/incoming/294x_boot_144.flp.gz You won't actually be able to see the file, but a blind "get" will retrieve it. Thanks, Justin