From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 17:56:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC2616A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:56:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBE943D46 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:56:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j7AHunfs003172; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:56:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:56:49 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Carstea Catalin Message-ID: <20050810175649.GH48947@dan.emsphone.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It is possible? Emails - backups. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:56:50 -0000 In the last episode (Aug 10), Carstea Catalin said: > How can i configure 2 server of mail : > 1. One to serve my users on LAN (pop3 , smtp); > 2. the second serverer is "the backup of mail boxes of first server" and > more: > -> if first server is down this server gets emails for my lan users? > Ex: [internet]------------->[first mail server]<----->[second mail server > - with same mailboxes as first]--------------------->[LAN] > 3. I want to run postfix. For SMTP traffic, it's easy: just edit your DNS and add two MX records tor "mydomain.com", one pointing to each server. Incoming emails will deliver to one and try the other if the first fails. Clustering the actual stored messages is a lot harder. I don't have any suggestions there. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com