From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 27 10: 8:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B48737B400; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0329.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.199.74] helo=mindspring.com) by avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16g8VL-00041f-00; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:08:40 -0800 Message-ID: <3C7D207F.D3E5CCE3@mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:07:59 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Warner Losh" Cc: gnn@neville-neil.com, phk@critter.freebsd.dk, rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Discussion of guidelines for additional version controlmechanisms (fwd) References: <200202271746.JAA1490499@meer.meer.net> <20020227.105520.83626055.imp@village.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "M. Warner Losh" wrote: > That's the $64k question. Our current worst case is the "rock > tumbler" school of management. You put everybody together in one big > hopper and spin. This knockes the rough edges off people. However, > it doesn't take into account differing "hardness" of the material that > people are made from so sometimes you end up with a hard rough rock > and dust, which is not a desirable outcome. This is a fortune candidate; in any case, I am keeping it for my personal archives. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message