From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 15 13:21:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D6A16A4CE; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:21:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1C543D49; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:21:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A64B1F5AA; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:21:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 310BE6347; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:21:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:21:08 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman Message-ID: <20050415132108.GC85922@stack.nl> References: <20050415050821.GO981@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hYooF8G/hrfVAmum" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050415050821.GO981@green.homeunix.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS client/buffer cache deadlock X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:21:10 -0000 --hYooF8G/hrfVAmum Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:08:21AM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > I'll spare a lengthy write-up because I think the patch documents it well > enough. It certainly appears to fix things here when doing very large > block-sized writes, but it also reduces the throughput with those block > sizes. (I don't think there should be any difference when using reasonable > block sizes). Is this supposed to fix kern/79208 ? Marc --hYooF8G/hrfVAmum Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFCX7/EezjnobFOgrERAoLmAJii/TuTg1aTOY8nktdo3d8UQM3gAJsHQT7r Ze2w/BMKz6HDJWrNgOT2dg== =moIe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hYooF8G/hrfVAmum--