From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 23 09:20:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6F810656DB; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from boogie@lazybytes.org) Received: from mail.lazybytes.org (odin.rinet.ru [195.54.209.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BB28FC1E; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (broadband-77-37-224-248.nationalcablenetworks.ru [77.37.224.248]) by mail.lazybytes.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A34314036E4; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:18:16 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:20:36 +0400 From: Sergey Vinogradov To: Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= Message-ID: <20090923132036.57767deb@lazybytes.org> In-Reply-To: <864oqu1urm.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <20090922135435.36a3d40e@lazybytes.org> <864oqu1urm.fsf@ds4.des.no> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/3g8Ig.nzBHzXBPQlHNRscOV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Ed Schouten , current@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:20:21 -0000 --Sig_/3g8Ig.nzBHzXBPQlHNRscOV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =D0=92 Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:26:05 +0200 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Sergey Vinogradov writes: > > Despite the zsh(1) has appropriate license, it needs autotools and > > iconv (both GPL AFAIK), so it's hard to include in the base system. > > The things in the base system I always wondered about are sendmail > > and bind9. These are pretty heavy, and definitely are not used in > > every single installation. Maybe someday I'll see sendmail and > > bind9 in ports instead of base system. And yes, I know about > > WITHOUT_BIND=3D and WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=3D :) >=20 > 1) Even in sh mode, zsh is not sufficiently POSIX-compliant to replace > our /bin/sh (and I say this as the maintainer of the zsh port) I think I've made my point unclear: I fully understand that, and I don't propose zsh(1) replacing sh(1). I just think it would be handy to have zsh(1) in the base system. Not replacing sh(1), but as one more piece of software. --=20 wbr, Boo --Sig_/3g8Ig.nzBHzXBPQlHNRscOV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkq56GQACgkQCt8hfbw1Gpa9ugCfYuxRQEVgCGWpH/BQx77jTQjq hvgAn18uOHbBRjrCZgrxiB3qVeUwt8Zi =Blk9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/3g8Ig.nzBHzXBPQlHNRscOV--