From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Jun 30 3:28:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from phoenix.welearn.com.au (phoenix.welearn.com.au [139.130.44.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A5E153DC for ; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:28:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sue@phoenix.welearn.com.au) Received: (from sue@localhost) by phoenix.welearn.com.au (8.9.1/8.9.0) id UAA01279; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:28:16 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <19990630202812.34161@welearn.com.au> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:28:12 +1000 From: Sue Blake To: UEBAYASHI Masao Cc: jesus.monroy@usa.net, kheuer@gwdu60.gwdg.de, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [FreeBSD Man Pages] References: <19990630092816.5964.qmail@nwcst021.netaddress.usa.net> <19990630194026.02734@welearn.com.au> <19990630190131N.masao@nf.enveng.titech.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <19990630190131N.masao@nf.enveng.titech.ac.jp>; from UEBAYASHI Masao on Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 07:01:31PM +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 07:01:31PM +0900, UEBAYASHI Masao wrote: > > > Very incorrect. Just a few days ago I show that 15% > > > of the online whatis(1) and man(1) records where > > > incorrect. > > For one definition of "incorrect". What you showed does not detract > > from the point that Konrad is making. > > For my studying English, I think the _trick_ is that the first word > ``incorrect'' can be read as two cases. > > If it was really trick, there is more stricter term of logic of > science for it, but I cannot remember it now... No, I don't think it's any trick. Different things are being judged by these two people, that's all. > > Masao > > --- > At last my signature can be internationalized! LOL > > |- > _|_ > > -|- -|- > /|\ /|\ Hey, that's neat! :-) -- Regards, ___ / ___ / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message