Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:11:22 +0200 From: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net> To: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Matthias Fechner <mfechner@FreeBSD.org>, Torsten Zuehlsdorff <tz@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r467510 - head/textproc/rubygem-autoprefixer-rails Message-ID: <2e5f6201-68ac-730d-b91f-2c0ef206ddc2@fechner.net> In-Reply-To: <3cbfa4ca-54ae-7df9-bb7a-8b1a5e724cdd@FreeBSD.org> References: <201804161833.w3GIXF20069435@repo.freebsd.org> <aed6c32c-0822-0827-b414-13b8b721656f@FreeBSD.org> <8d3b5430-56da-fd8d-fbe4-df791f02b94a@fechner.net> <3cbfa4ca-54ae-7df9-bb7a-8b1a5e724cdd@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 20.04.2018 um 23:49 schrieb Steve Wills: > I think I was mistaken, I deleted Gemfile.lock and it was OK. hm, should we maybe put the Gemfile.lock generation into the port itself? But that means, that everytime a gem got updated, PORTREVISION of gitlab must be increased. But I think that should make the port for a standard user easier to use/upgrade. What do you think? Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2e5f6201-68ac-730d-b91f-2c0ef206ddc2>