From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 14:26:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81A41D18 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from the-host.seacom.mu (ge-1.ln-01-jnb.za.seacomnet.com [105.28.96.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A84A1C4E for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=the-host.localnet) by the-host.seacom.mu with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XqNFm-0007Tt-0G; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:26:06 +0200 From: Mark Tinka Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu Organization: SEACOM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update - 10.0 to 10.1 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:26:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-24-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; i686; ; ) References: <201411170840.06373.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> <201411171550.10873.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> <001301d0026f$878bdce0$96a396a0$@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <001301d0026f$878bdce0$96a396a0$@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1778692.xilG9ZyYhE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201411171626.05487.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> Cc: Jerry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:26:12 -0000 --nextPart1778692.xilG9ZyYhE Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, November 17, 2014 04:05:22 PM Jerry wrote: > I received the same message. I decided to go ahead and do > a complete rebuild of the ports. The message also stated > that I should run "freebsd-update install" after > rebuilding the ports. I assume I do that before > rebooting the machine. Is that correct? I am also > assuming that I should rebuild the ports BEFORE > rebooting. I hope so. Because that is what I am doing > and there was no message that stated I should reboot > first. When upgrading between major versions, yes, you certainly=20 need to rebuild all userland ports before doing the second=20 reboot, otherwise all hell will break loose when libraries=20 for the major version are incompatibile with userland ports=20 built with a library from a previous major version. My issue is I've never had to do this when upgrading minor=20 revisions within the same release train. So I'll go ahead and ignore the message and let you all know=20 what happens. Mark. --nextPart1778692.xilG9ZyYhE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUagV9AAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GV4UP/iSJAFjWMk/vi1I58iDQxkg7 Ce1Oh77zmG83Bb3uPFg+JLDhfyUbo8t8bM4k+AmxWgwPxFReKTUV7QNTysHqhHOE 5xAsXjc1uy2rBpQ9/B6ZZrc5av4duqqVAfREzRh4HFCVQCyGzEhM5a4ZFKw+I9wF 10ryt5w0oOqJl61ZQYC2kEsDiYtH3q9oQfRu2tLzwyG96Mu/vC90Z88fwKqrwDQb UllLxLj4viB0FNNqZ+D1GqGyI4PwN50IT//rNDKLEU/CfqAJbEO7AMM7TFDAamQA qxPrkvPXTVYcA+iASujd306PZcPEwnL/8D8mcEPvykSh34OBRKMtgIj+/H14Adv9 PhRWZlw47T6lRW9zjbnnOyl5/aZ4DWATM+Fwr4k51MghRKz6N34t+FK3NjQcD4cb Bw6VknyIJ8PnmnMxqPo+IJvvsIajkQZypQnrTM0yqU9ZRyhXjDTwhKAgAcFT0Iki BcDRDzQlES1jAGTr4y8jlrlAronMGp/fqwaAh1kbov+D4lcChboKXJRs7A+nrNGz q74gMFZHbJSPb1lnaxCq3MLFDJyWDXaqfr3qKpzaki9bma76EVLTgOHkqfSKN7y6 V2gPxlz5Nl3VzYG57cpPoTAqc1R2i9v7wNNebKaIK2LhM7cpI60SfEepcpGfONMm v6ueMA6OA6DEo+sp+Npv =49Xe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1778692.xilG9ZyYhE--