Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:42:24 +0100 From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_Sp=F6rlein?= <uqs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: why we don't build ps/pdf of /usr/src/share/doc/usd/ ? Message-ID: <52521438-A6FD-4D59-858F-A42BD7D064C8@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120812210125.GI1202@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <201208092302.q79N2BcA079307@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <FBD8F575-BE57-4FD8-8DB6-A28CEE9F01C9@FreeBSD.org> <20120812210125.GI1202@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 Aug 2012, at 22:01, Ulrich Sp=F6rlein <uqs@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 23:45:04 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: >>=20 >> On 10 Aug 2012, at 00:02, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> = wrote: >>=20 >>> We build /usr/src/share/doc/usd/ into ascii >>> documents. Is there a reason why we don't >>> also build Postscript or PDF? >>=20 >> I suspect since it was considered waste of space originally when it = was set up. >>=20 >> If anyone were to touch those docs I would suggest moving them to the = doc repository instead of changing them where they currently exist as = they don't really belong in src. >=20 > I have this planned, but as with many things I hardly get to do any of > them. Slacking slacking slacking ;-). On a more serious note, sounds great and I really do know the feeling. > The move to doc is needed to cut groff out of the base system. Ah, ok. --=20 Simon L. B. Nielsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52521438-A6FD-4D59-858F-A42BD7D064C8>