From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 15:23:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01A016A469 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lulf@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: from fri.itea.ntnu.no (fri.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.7.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3FD13C4D0 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lulf@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fri.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCC88289; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:05:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from twoflower.idi.ntnu.no (twoflower.idi.ntnu.no [129.241.104.169]) by fri.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:05:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by twoflower.idi.ntnu.no (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 6C7CB17023; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:05:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:05:05 +0200 From: Ulf Lilleengen To: Giancarlo Rubio Message-ID: <20070617150505.GA37562@twoflower.idi.ntnu.no> Mail-Followup-To: Giancarlo Rubio , "..."@twoflower.idi.ntnu.no, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org References: <20070617142631.GA33976@twoflower.idi.ntnu.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Cc: "..."@twoflower.idi.ntnu.no, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gvinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "..."@twoflower.idi.ntnu.no List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:23:07 -0000 On søn, jun 17, 2007 at 02:29:09pm +0000, Giancarlo Rubio wrote: > > The difference is because of the filesystem layout and metadata, while > > gvinum > > show's you the "raw" disk data size. > > > > When it comes to the negative numbers...I think this might have something > > to do > > with the filesystem and not gvinum. But perhaps you could send the output > > off > > 'gvinum printconfig'? > > gvinum -> printconfig > # Vinum configuration of servidor.AERO, saved at Sun Jun 17 11:28:31 2007 > drive raid53 device /dev/ad7s1a > drive raid52 device /dev/ad6s1a > drive raid51 device /dev/ad4s1a > volume data > plex name data.p0 org raid5 388s vol data > sd name data.p0.s2 drive raid53 len 781422300s driveoffset 265s plex > data.p0 plexoffset 776s > sd name data.p0.s1 drive raid52 len 781422300s driveoffset 265s plex > data.p0 plexoffset 388s > sd name data.p0.s0 drive raid51 len 781419196s driveoffset 265s plex > data.p0 plexoffset 0s > gvinum -> Well, seems ok. Everything works fine, right? Perhaps just a bug in 'df'. Btw, it's not recommended to have different sized subdisk in the array. -- Ulf Lilleengen