From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 09:30:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D5916A404; Sun, 6 May 2007 09:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634BB13C480; Sun, 6 May 2007 09:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C16F8BD3D9; Sun, 6 May 2007 11:30:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kRzYUAzVx3NI; Sun, 6 May 2007 11:30:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2408BD3AD; Sun, 6 May 2007 11:30:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l469UYbV043005; Sun, 6 May 2007 11:30:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 11:30:34 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Danny Braniss Message-ID: <20070506093034.GA42976@freebsd.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 06 May 2007 11:27:17 +0000 Cc: Craig Rodrigues , Masanori OZAWA , FreeBSD Hackers , Daichi GOTO , Ed Schouten , Stanislav Sedov , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-19-20070504 release, it is now MPSAFE and transparent mode as default X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 09:30:42 -0000 > Hi, > So far I've tested it under -current, in my diskless env. where > /etc & /compat/linux are unionfs'ed with a mfs, and so all seems OK. there's an XXX in the linuxulator code saying: XXX Untested vs. mount -o union; probably does the wrong thing. can you confirm that it works ok with unionfs from daichi? thnx roman