Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 21:40:05 -0700 From: Darryl Okahata <darrylo@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com> To: richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk) Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: DAT or removable device? Message-ID: <199608290440.AA252923606@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Aug 1996 17:14:14 -1000." <199608290314.RAA08700@pegasus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> } * Supposedly, the NCR/Symbios-based cards don't perform well under heavy
> } loads, such as when you have three or more disks being accessed
> } *simultaneously*. This isn't an issue for most people.
>
> This appears to be hearsay. No numbers have been presented.
That's why I said, "supposedly". I've got an NCR-based controller,
and I REALLY like it, but I'd be remiss if I didn't list any possible
drawbacks mentioned by the respectable folks here. ;-)
Does anyone know of any good SCSI subsystem benchmarking programs
(heavy loading of multiple disks, etc.)?
-- Darryl Okahata
Internet: darrylo@sr.hp.com
DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Hewlett-Packard, or of the
little green men that have been following him all day.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608290440.AA252923606>
