Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Aug 1996 21:40:05 -0700
From:      Darryl Okahata <darrylo@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com>
To:        richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk)
Cc:        freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: DAT or removable device? 
Message-ID:  <199608290440.AA252923606@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Aug 1996 17:14:14 -1000." <199608290314.RAA08700@pegasus.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> } * Supposedly, the NCR/Symbios-based cards don't perform well under heavy
> }   loads, such as when you have three or more disks being accessed
> }   *simultaneously*.  This isn't an issue for most people.
> 
> This appears to be hearsay.  No numbers have been presented.

     That's why I said, "supposedly".  I've got an NCR-based controller,
and I REALLY like it, but I'd be remiss if I didn't list any possible
drawbacks mentioned by the respectable folks here.  ;-)

     Does anyone know of any good SCSI subsystem benchmarking programs
(heavy loading of multiple disks, etc.)?

     -- Darryl Okahata
	Internet: darrylo@sr.hp.com

DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Hewlett-Packard, or of the
little green men that have been following him all day.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608290440.AA252923606>