From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Oct 29 19:24:06 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA08969 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 19:24:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA08961 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 19:24:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA16970; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 19:23:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 19:23:53 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Font cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: top in 2.2.5R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 28 Oct 1997, Font wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, Doug White wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, Font wrote: > > > I was testing 2.2.5R a few moments ago when I noticed that the top(1) > > > command had output all zeroes for %user/nice/system/interrupt/idle and all > > > zeroes for TIME/WCPU/CPU. Is this a known problem, or is it just me? I > > > believe the last install on another computer with RELENG-2.2-970911 didn't > > > have this particular problem. Hints on fixing it also welcome. :-) > > > > Top is probably out of date. Try upgrading. > > Hmm, what is there to upgrade to after 2.2.5R? This is /usr/bin/top in > the bin distribution, installed by default, not anything installed > afterwards. Or do you mean something else? Thanks for your reply to this > very minor question. Hm, I'm used to using the port. Building it from source may fix you up. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major