From owner-freebsd-isp  Fri Jul 18 13:06:06 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA13375
          for isp-outgoing; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ady.warp.starnets.ro (ady.warp.starnets.ro [193.226.124.33])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA13316
          for <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ady@localhost)
	by ady.warp.starnets.ro (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA03415;
	Fri, 18 Jul 1997 22:59:29 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 22:59:29 +0300 (EEST)
From: Penisoara Adrian <ady@warp.starnets.ro>
To: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@roguetrader.com>
cc: John-David Childs <jdc@denver.net>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: upgrading to a safe BIND?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970718131613.29172B-100000@roguetrader.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970718225326.3349A-100000@ady.warp.starnets.ro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi !

On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, Brandon Gillespie wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, John-David Childs wrote:
> > > work?  What differs between the bind distributed with FreeBSD and the bind
> > > at isc.org?
> > 
> > I compiled 8..1.1 on FreeBSD 2.2.2 last week.  It compiles out of the box.
> > THe primary differences are that FreeBSD puts some of the binaries in
> > different places than isc does (e.g. /usr/bin vs. /usr/sbin) and that the
> > isc man pages go in /usr/share/man/cat* instead of /usr/share/man/man*
> 
> Why don't we ship FreeBSD with bind-8?  From what I've read, it seems like
> the better of the two..

 I stick with bind-8 too ! bind-4 is maintained only for 'compatibility'
while bind-8 is the official developement kit...

 Now I'd surely like to see 'jkh@time.cdrom.com' signature after "named
8.1.1" ... don't you Jordan ? :) No offence.

> 
> -Brandon Gillespie
> 
> 

Ady (@warp.starnets.ro)