Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:20:17 -0400
From:      Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Approaching the limit on PV entries
Message-ID:  <CAMXt9NZbn8OAvRQVvYSi8c2N2ajfASjDnXDwyXqKsFr9B%2BJOtA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE-mSOJw1wo9SqtfDfH9Qn30cUKyuiB1aTTwqdQU7-5iDrFdPg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAMXt9NapczKEmBU3Wwwh99jb6Vv9bhejxgpmVqStGBwvP7BmAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAE-mSOK-JswcJXRPMfMxVZpc0H5gZ5-iv5H4-zDDPxfau=E=vA@mail.gmail.com> <201203211119.43022.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAE-mSOJw1wo9SqtfDfH9Qn30cUKyuiB1aTTwqdQU7-5iDrFdPg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
> On 21 March 2012 19:19, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 11:37:57 am Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>>> On 22 November 2011 19:29, Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org> wrote:
>>> > Hello All
>>>
>>> [found this mail in my drafts, not sure if my answer is still useful]
>>>
>>> > =C2=A0I want to get to the bottom of a warning in dmesg. On 7.2-RELEA=
SE and
>>> > 7.3-RELEASE I have seen the following warning in dmesg.
>>> >
>>> > Approaching the limit on PV entries, consider increasing either the
>>> > vm.pmap.shpgperproc or the vm.pmap.pv_entry_max sysctl.
>>> >
>>> > So looking around I see a few posts here and there about how to tune
>>> > the sysctls to address the warning however I am not 100% sure what
>>> > each value does.
>>> > It appears changing vm.pmap.shpgperproc affects the value of
>>> > vm.pmap.pv_entry_max . Can someone explain the relationship of the tw=
o
>>> > sysctls. Also
>>>
>>> This is how they are calculated.
>>>
>>> pv_entry_max =3D shpgperproc * maxproc + cnt.v_page_count;
>>>
>>> and, respectively,
>>>
>>> shpgperproc =3D (pv_entry_max - cnt.v_page_count) / maxproc;
>>>
>>> So, changing one sysctl will change another and vice versa.
>>>
>>> > what pitfalls of changing them are.
>>>
>>> Not known to me (on amd64 platform).
>>> I have had vm.pmap.shpgperproc=3D15000 on 8.1 amd64 with 4G RAM
>>> to make some badly written commercial software to work until it
>>> was decommissioned to the scrap.
>>
>> FYI, Alan just removed this warning and the associated sysctls from HEAD
>> yesterday because they were made obsolete several years ago. =C2=A0I thi=
nk they are
>> obsolete even on 7. =C2=A0Certainly on 8.
>
> Yep, and since switching to direct map (somewhere around 7.x on amd64?)
> made PV entry limit factually obsolete, this is really cool.
>
> --
> wbr,
> pluknet

Interesting so this warning is relevant in 7.x ?

--=20
mark saad | nonesuch@longcount.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMXt9NZbn8OAvRQVvYSi8c2N2ajfASjDnXDwyXqKsFr9B%2BJOtA>