From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 26 08:50:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5CF106564A; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:50:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D728FC15; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5Q8oSts001834; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:50:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5Q8oRYx001831; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:50:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:50:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Chris Rees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2456600518-377125759-1340700627=:1828" X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:50:28 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current , Arnaud Lacombe , kby@freebsd.org, bp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysctl filesystem ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:50:34 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2456600518-377125759-1340700627=:1828 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT > > > > as well as we don't depend of /proc for normal operation we shouldn't for say /proc/sysctl > > > > improvements are welcome, better documentation is welcome, changes to what is OK - isn't. > > /proc/sysctl might be useful.  Just because Linux uses it doesn't make it a bad idea. actually - i don't know since over 5 years what linux do. --2456600518-377125759-1340700627=:1828--