From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 00:51:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDA3106566B; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:51:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883C11507FE; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F0F800E.6060505@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:51:26 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gabor Kovesdan References: <201201061944.q06JiwUR048089@repoman.freebsd.org> <4F0BF9F3.40009@FreeBSD.org> <4F0C2E7C.6070802@FreeBSD.org> <4F0CC4DF.6030906@FreeBSD.org> <4F0ED9F1.20305@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F0ED9F1.20305@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Scheidell , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Greg Larkin , raven428@gmail.com, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/pinba_engine Makefile distinfo ports/devel/pinba_engine/files patch-src__ha_pinba.cc X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:51:27 -0000 On 01/12/2012 05:02, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Em 11-01-2012 00:08, Doug Barton escreveu: >> .if ${MYSQL_VER} == 52 >> MYSQL_PORTDIR= ${PORTSDIR}/databases/mariadb-server >> .else >> MYSQL_PORTDIR= ${PORTSDIR}/databases/mysql${MYSQL_VER}-server >> .endif > Although compatible, MariaDB is not MySQL. We use it heavily as a drop-in replacement and have not run into any problems. Do you have specific concerns? > From the user perspective I definitely would not want such behavior. The only way a user would get this behavior is to set MYSQL_VER= 52 in their environment. I don't understand why a user who purposely set this would object to having the ports infrastructure respect it. Doug -- You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/