From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 10 03:35:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 5AFA71065697; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:35:23 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: "David E. O'Brien" Message-ID: <20100910033523.GB72617@FreeBSD.org> References: <201009100230.o8A2UpdE086066@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201009100230.o8A2UpdE086066@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile options X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:35:23 -0000 On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 02:30:51AM +0000, David E. O'Brien wrote: > obrien 2010-09-10 02:30:51 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > shells/bash Makefile > Added files: > shells/bash options > Log: > Add OPTIONS processing. Can you please explain why do you employ these rather obscure constructions instead of cleanly and naturally defining OPTIONS within the Makefile, like it is normally done in other ports? ./danfe