From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 17 9:19:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5994337B401 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:19:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97] ident=root) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #7) id 15MXZS-000EGg-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:19:38 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f6HGJbc62017 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:19:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:19:37 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: any benefits to XFree86 4 on a laptop? Message-ID: <20010717171937.A61988@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG No fancy graphics chips or anything, I just wondered if it is more efficient, stable, or otherwise better. jcm -- o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o | ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jonathon McKitrick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | "I prefer the term 'Artificial Person' myself." | o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message