From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 12:29:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8051D16A4D0 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:29:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch [62.48.0.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C526043FAF for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:29:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oppermann@pipeline.ch) Received: (qmail 67716 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2003 20:32:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pipeline.ch) ([62.48.0.53]) (envelope-sender ) by mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Nov 2003 20:32:44 -0000 Message-ID: <3FAFF523.C3FF55F3@pipeline.ch> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:29:23 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leo Bicknell References: <3FAE68FB.64D262FF@pipeline.ch> <20031110005543.C532@odysseus.silby.com> <3FAF62BE.BEA1B3EE@pipeline.ch> <20031110133307.R1101@odysseus.silby.com> <20031110201552.GA3148@ussenterprise.ufp.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: mb@imp.ch cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: ume@freebsd.org cc: sam@errno.com cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcp hostcache and ip fastforward for review X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:29:59 -0000 Leo Bicknell wrote: > > In a message written on Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:45:48PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > At the moment is visible via "sysctl -a net.inet.tcp.hostcache.list". > > > Syncache ain't visible via netstat either. So far you had to use > > > route get x.x.x.x to see the rtmetrics for a (host-)route. So I'm > > > sure whether netstat is the right place for it. But I can do that > > > in a second step. > > > > Ok, that should be good enough for now. > > I'm not going to say it's not good enough, but more than once the whole > "route get" thing has been quite inconveniant, so I'll put in a big vote > that both be available in easy to get table form from some command line > utility (netstat seems like a good place). I'll look into that when 5.2 is in code freeze. Can then put it in afterwards. -- Andre