Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:38:27 +0100
From:      Clemens Hermann <haribeau@gmx.de>
To:        Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: bandwith limitation
Message-ID:  <20010116203827.C2261@ramses.local>
In-Reply-To: <200101161822.f0GIMNF09755@iguana.aciri.org> von Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org> am 16.Jan.2001 um 10:22:23 (-0800)
References:  <20010116201508.A2261@ramses.local> <200101161822.f0GIMNF09755@iguana.aciri.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 16.01.2001 um 10:22:23 schrieb Luigi Rizzo:

Hi Luigi,

hopefully you are not nerved by my continuing question, but there is still one 
thing I did not dompletely understand.

> if ipf says no it says no. you just want tobe sure that
> the packet actually passes through both things.

I just do not know how to make this sure. It probably might have something 
to do with my kernel-config, right? So I show you how I would do it, perhaps
you could tell if with this configuration every package passes both
packages:

options		IPFILTER
options		IPFILTER_LOG

options		IPFIREWALL
options		IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT

So if I have set up the config file for ipf (Firewall) and I only have
configuration for bandwith limits in the ipfw config, does this make
sure every packet passes ipf and is blocked if ipf says this?

Thanks again for your help and patience

/ch


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010116203827.C2261>