From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 20 5:59:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1434F14F1D; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 05:59:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA22738; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 14:56:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Peter Wemm Cc: smp@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Testers please! In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 20 Sep 1999 20:41:19 +0800." <19990920124119.509B71CC5@overcee.netplex.com.au> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 14:56:54 +0200 Message-ID: <22736.937832214@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <19990920124119.509B71CC5@overcee.netplex.com.au>, Peter Wemm writes : >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> Ok, noted. I changed to to fail the probe but still use the hardware. > >If intpm is probed first (the smbus driver), your probe won't even get >called. I think we need an early quirks or hooks handler in the pci probes >to handle stuff like this. For example, we have hooks fixing up a handful >of wierd bios misconfigurations, collecting these together via a quirks >table or whatever would also give a convenient place for you to hook this >sort of thing into, and without it being dependent on link or probe order. sigh... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message