From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 13:37:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538E516A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:37:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B8C43D86 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:37:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from oook.cz (nobody@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAADb04d091503; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:37:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: "Pav Lucistnik" To: vd@datamax.bg, Kris Kennaway Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:37:00 +0100 Message-Id: <20051110133620.M84613@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20051110131640.GA85826@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <20051109165951.GA75924@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20051109170437.GW28443@droso.net> <20051109182405.GB27053@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051110131640.GA85826@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.51 20050228 X-OriginatingIP: 195.122.204.152 (cvs@oook.cz) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 X-Spam-Score: -4.399 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 127.0.0.1; Sender-helo: oook.cz; ) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SHA256 checksums X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:37:34 -0000 On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:16:40 +0200, Vasil Dimov wrote > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:24:05PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > If someone can do this in a way that is > > > > *** Careful *** > > > > i.e. they: > > > > * verify that they are not committing random other changes together > > with the sha checksum > > > > * deal with the fact that 'make checksum' on their machine may not add > > checksums for all of the files listed in distinfo (and in such a case > > will actually remove them, breaking the port for others) > > > > then it would be better to do them in batches instead of getting > > committers to deal with hundreds of individual PRs. > > Ok, here is a tool that takes a ports dir and hacks it, adding > sha256 sums for the available distfiles. Where? Anyway, "make makesum" is not enough? > A diff from my ports dir can be found at: > http://vdev.datamax.bg/tmp/ports_sha256.diff.gz > (655 distfiles available) Please send-pr it, otherwise it will almost certainly get lost. -- Pav Lucistnik