Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 09 Jul 2001 13:16:25 +0200
From:      Michael Schuster <michael.schuster@sun.com>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        Robert Drehmel <robert@ferrari.de>, freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: port progress note
Message-ID:  <3B499289.FB775B7@sun.com>
References:  <20010709105328.A1149@obelix.develop.ferrari.net> <20010709020809.E15863@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010709112918.A1309@obelix.develop.ferrari.net> <20010709040921.A94419@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

David O'Brien wrote:

> > In which ways will V9 and V10 differ? I just think that
> > we cannot support every future 64 bit SPARC architecture
> > with one port.
> 
> I disagree.

hmm ... I'd say this should be handled "on demand", ie. when a new Sparc
Architecture comes out and people realise a seperate port is needed, that
_then_ a new port is done, but not before.

FWIW, I tend to agree with David.

Michael
-- 
Michael Schuster          / Michael.Schuster@sun.com

Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B499289.FB775B7>