Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:09:51 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=C3=BCsch?= <martin@waschbuesch.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Gasol Wu <gasol.wu@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Future of pecl ports Message-ID: <5D117A00-AC45-452B-97F7-6B507ADD4E77@waschbuesch.de> In-Reply-To: <CAHYWXROhehMz8qKBs20On-6AUOF2R362fqwbWVr4JJTpPDMjvQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFY%2ByEkfxu%2BTSaSAJsJpcnFhEUxd=RLt26CpSLUmVStG3tPFxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHYWXROhehMz8qKBs20On-6AUOF2R362fqwbWVr4JJTpPDMjvQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 14.03.2016 um 11:37 schrieb Gasol Wu <gasol.wu@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi miwi,
>
> First of all, I'm appreciated for your PHP support in FreeBSD.
>
> I have received many outdated notices regarding the PECL ports from
> portscout because I'm the maintainer.
> I saw the same problem here when I start to packaging, So I'm so happy
> to see this discussion here.
>
> IMHO, I will vote option (c). Here is my thought.
>
> 1. Explicit is better than implicit
> 2. It will be bad if we upgrade ports without changing port name,
> especially they have BC problems.
> 3. I would like to see official support for installing different
> version of PHP in same FreeBSD box
> without using 3rd-party tools like phpbrew or phpenv.
> Imagine that we have /usr/local/bin/{php55,php56,php70} respectively
Totally agree.
If this is where we're headed, I'd like to pitch in and help make #3 happen.
Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5D117A00-AC45-452B-97F7-6B507ADD4E77>