From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jun 20 20:38:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from storage-1.netscalibur.it (mail1.netscalibur.it [194.244.215.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BD737B409 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 20:38:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from olgeni@FreeBSD.org) Received: from dev1.localdomain.net (194.244.229.102) by storage-1.netscalibur.it (5.5.031) id 3B29D8B50000634E; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:05:55 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dev1.localdomain.net (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f5IF98O00775; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:09:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olgeni@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:09:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Jimmy Olgeni X-X-Sender: To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: Subject: Re: ports/28254: Update port: lang/hugs new maintainer and update to Feb2001 Version In-Reply-To: <200106181500.f5IF0Fu55797@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20010618170645.L758-100000@dev1.localdomain.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > How does the current maintainer of this feel? I already asked, this patch is approved :) But maybe PORTREVISION should be numeric, using a date could break version comparisons in some utilities. -- jimmy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message