From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 19 20:21:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F76716CFD0 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:21:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402A813C47E for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:21:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1JKLBUF027642; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:21:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l1JKLAkQ021489 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:21:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200702192021.l1JKLAkQ021489@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:19:19 -0500 To: Francisco Reyes From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: References: <200702172201.l1HM1BnR009915@lava.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav replacement for FreeBSD+postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:21:12 -0000 At 03:08 PM 2/19/2007, Francisco Reyes wrote: >Mike Tancsa writes: > >>>Great. That sound promissing. >>>Is this with i386 or amd64? >>i386. clamav, spamassassin/mimedefang are all slower on amd64 > >Thanks for the feedback. >How much memory on your machine(s)? We have 7 machines doing spam and virus scanning for a number of client machines. We have 2G of RAM per machine which is enough so things do not swap. >Part of the reason I was thinking amd64 is because the servers have 4GB. >Doesn't one need PAE at 4GB and above? Why do you need so much per server to do spam/virus scanning ? If anything, leave the 4G inside but just boot with i386. It will waste a bit, but I am guessing better than using PAE e.g. here is one such 4G server we have. CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ (2210.20-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x20fb1 Stepping = 1 Features=0x178bfbff Features2=0x1 AMD Features=0xe2500800 AMD Features2=0x3 Cores per package: 2 real memory = 3756916736 (3582 MB) avail memory = 3677523968 (3507 MB) ACPI APIC Table: >We get our machines installed with FreeBSD and the vendor has been >putting PAE on machines with 4GB, but I am wondering if it is even needed. I have never used (nor trusted) PAE. ---Mike