From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 16 06:06:12 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: perl@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E55106564A;
	Sat, 16 Jul 2011 06:06:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 65-241-43-4.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA4D14EDF8;
	Sat, 16 Jul 2011 06:06:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4E212A50.3030506@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:06:08 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
References: <20110716050732.GB25141@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110716050732.GB25141@lonesome.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, perl@FreeBSD.org, skv@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: RFC: change to bsd.perl.mk
X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports
	<freebsd-perl.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-perl>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-perl@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 06:06:12 -0000

On 07/15/2011 22:07, Mark Linimon wrote:
> Per Doug Barton's suggestion, I have reworked the long-standing patch
> to bsd.perl.mk to be an exact copy of the logic in bsd.port.mk, and
> done an -exp run.  Does anyone have any objection if I commit this
> patch?

This is actually the exact opposite of what I suggested.

My suggestion is that we put all of the necessary perl stuff in
bsd.perl.mk, and in bpm we make inclusion of bsd.perl.mk conditional on
USE_PERL5. Following that change do an -exp run and ask for help fixing
any ports that don't properly define USE_PERL5.

If bsd.perl.mk is going to be included unconditionally, what's the point
of having it in a separate file?


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/