From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Oct 12 05:50:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA19052 for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 05:50:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA18943; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 05:49:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joerg@FreeBSD.org) From: Joerg Wunsch Received: (from joerg@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.6/8.8.5) id FAA05963; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 05:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 05:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199710121248.FAA05963@freefall.freebsd.org> To: jin@adv-pc-1.lbl.gov, joerg@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/4167 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Synopsis: dump fials for dumping subdirectory State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: joerg State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 12 14:46:00 MEST 1997 State-Changed-Why: It seems to be intention that dump(8) only accepts the root of a filesystem. This can be argued about, but most people who specify a subdirectory would expect it to dump data beginning right at this subdirectory, so the suggested change is IMHO counter-intuitive. If someone would offer a patch that makes dump(8) work on subdirs, i certainly wouldn't mind...